Chapter 4 case study

The findings validate the operations planning phase of the planning process. In addition to building the necessary ramp infrastructure, the project will replace deficient bridge components, expand bicycle and pedestrian facilities, accommodate future street- cars, and make aesthetic improvements to the bridge and freeway interchanges.

State DOTs would benefit from a maturity model that defines various levels of organizational capability with respect to these success factors. The analysis approach represented in this case study repre- sents a first step in the overall incorporation of reliability per- formance measures in the investment prioritization process.

This has important implications for the SHRP 2 L05 project, as it appears that many states would benefit from guidance on determining eligibility of funding operations improvements under specific silos or funding categories or making the required policy changes to set up 37 Table 4.

Developed a method for incorporating reliability into the project selection process. This is a critical first step in identifying reliability deficiencies on freeway segments and potential traffic operations strategies for improving reliability on these segments.

Full write-ups of each case study can be found in the technical reference. One of the main rea- sons for this was opposition from the community on the west side of the river. Mid Projected construction completion. The case study results show that arterial reliability measures require robust data sets that provide sufficient data points on each roadway of interest during all times of interest.

They have annual solicitations for agen- cies in LA County to apply for funding to improve arterial operations. These agencies had very little experience with EISs and large projects, and this was the first major transportation project for both the Table 4.

The National Academies Press. As expected, when nonrecurring delay is considered in the analysis, the overall delay estimates are much greater with the baseline delay more than doubling from 2.

Looking for other ways to read this?

Improvements and enhancements to this process may include the following. Each case study validation site was organized around specific planning products or processes.

Sign up for free to view: Data source consistency is critical. Key findings include the following results.

Developing plans based on per- formance data provides decision makers, taxpayers and users with assurances that implemented projects will meet perfor- mance goals, will be a high priority based on performance, and will provide users with specific benefits.

The use of this portable detection and monitoring system indicates to other agencies that corridor reliability studies and opera- tions improvements benefits analysis can be conducted inexpensively. These lessons learned, which generally come directly from interviews with staff from the project or resource agencies, can offer valuable insight into why the strategy worked, techniques or factors that could have improved it, or specific scenarios for which staff believe the strategy is most beneficial.

This results in highly congested neighborhood streets, degraded air quality, increased noise, and other fac- tors affecting transportation access, mobility, and quality of life.

From the state of the practice survey, 13 MPOs, 19 DOTs, and two transportation authorities expressed inter- est in participating in a more detailed case study.

Reliability can be incorporated in the trade-off analysis process and will likely impact the results of the prioritization process; the use of representative corridors can be effective in conducting a regional analysis; assessments of reliability can be conducted even in situations with limited data availability.

The case study validated the following success factors for incorporating reliability into the planning and programming process: The new project will eliminate this cut-through traffic; separate local traffic crossing the river from Interstate traffic crossing the river; and provide improved transit, bike, and pedestrian access across the river.

Selection Criteria The team has defined multiple criteria for selecting validation case study sites. While the guide is intended to be applied at MPOs and DOTs at different levels of sophis- tication facing different levels of reliability problems, it is important that validation take place at agencies that have some conceptual understanding of reliability and face real reliability challenges.

This validation case study identifies methods to better achieve that objective. Page Share Suggested Citation:Start studying chapter 4 case studies. Learn vocabulary, terms, and more with flashcards, games, and other study tools.

Writing Chapter 4 Chapter 4 is comprised of the following If the design is a single-case study, the unit of analysis is the entire case being studied (Yin, ). In qualitative studies, Chapter 5 follows the same major theme section titles as in chapter four.

Learn case studies chapter 4 with free interactive flashcards. Choose from different sets of case studies chapter 4 flashcards on Quizlet.

Chapter 4: Los Angeles Basin Case Study review the numbers and demographics of residents, schools, daycare centers and other “sensitive receptors” in proximity to existing active oil and gas development operations.

Chapter 4 Case Studies 1 and 2

Freight Intermodal Connectors Study Chapter 4. Case Studies. The objective of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) Intermodal Connectors Study is to provide a comprehensive understanding of the condition and performance of the Nation’s freight intermodal connectors.

Chapter 4 Case Study 1. Chapter 5 Result and Discussion. ELIV. Figure 7.

The business model of ELIV Social Entrepreneur Kevin Cheng set up ELIV to create a new path for Taiwanese to see the world in a way different to traditional travel, work, and study abroad pathways. The new path is international voluntourism (volunteer tourism).

Chapter 4 case study
Rated 5/5 based on 71 review