Revising and Requesting a Different Study Section. If you disagree, explain why, and provide additional information if possible. And if you need additional preliminary data or new data is imminent, wait until you have it before resubmitting. Get advice from your program officer and experts in your institution before proceeding and again after you prepare your resubmission.
You must include an introduction for all resubmission that: See what worked for others. Include any new preliminary data you have, and strengthen the application where possible—even in areas your reviewers did not question. You may want to begin revising even before you get your summary statement since waiting may cause you to miss the next receipt date.
Outline them in your introduction, summarizing substantial additions, deletions, and changes to the application as well as responding to major weaknesses raised in the summary statement. Thereafter, the application must be submitted as a new application. If you wait to submit for the Cycle 3 receipt dates May Council instead, you could lose just a month or two before you actually get an award.
Start revising as soon as you can and resubmit when ready, keeping in mind the caveats noted above and in the next section below. One metric we can use to look at impact, discussed previously on this blog, is the relative citation ratio or RCR.
Summarizes the issues and criticisms and respond in as much detail as possible. Sometimes waiting has little impact on the timing of an award.
You must resubmit within 37 months of the application it follows. You may submit an unfunded new application as new again, without a resubmission.
If your reviewers were not enthusiastic about your idea, reassess the study section. In other words, are there any observable trends in the impact of publications resulting from an NIH grant funded as an A0, versus those funded as an A1 or A2?
Inseveral years after A2s were eliminated, half of awards came from A0 applications and half from A1 applications. Choose Your Path Your resubmission can take one of two paths: When one application is funded, NIH automatically withdraws the other.NIH R01 Guide – Forms D: A “resubmission” or “renewal” application should normally have Attach the cover letter, addressed to the Division of Receipt and Referral, in accordance with the announcement and/or the agency specific instructions.
Applicants are. R01 Sample Applications and Summary Statements The R01 is the NIH standard independent research project grant. An R01 is meant to give you four or five years of support to complete a project, publish, and reapply before the grant ends. 2 NIH / PHS Cover Letter • SPO no longer includes a separate cover letter for NIH submissions.
• PI is encouraged (by NIH), but not required to include a cover letter with every application. • Cover letter is for internal NIH use and will not be shared with peer reviews • Some situations require a cover letter. NIH / PHS Cover Letter Template.
The letter of intent should be sent by the date listed on the specific FOA and to the contact and address listed therein.
For more information, contact the Program Officer. Apr 25, · Applications, Resubmissions, and the Relative Citation Ratio Posted on April 25, by Mike Lauer Measuring the impact of NIH grants is an important input in. Jul 24, · An application submitted as new to one Program Announcement (like the Parent R01) may be resubmitted as an A1 (resubmission) to any other Program Announcement, so long as that program announcement accepts resubmissions and it is submitted within 37 months of the A0 (original, new) submission.Download